ATS Keywords
UI Designer ATS Keywords: Get Your CV Past the Screening Bots
Applicant tracking systems scan UI Designer CVs for specific tool names and design vocabulary before a human ever opens a portfolio, so a CV heavy on soft skills and light on terms like Figma, design systems, or prototyping can get filtered out automatically. Because so much of a UI Designer's real skill lives in visual work a keyword scanner cannot see, the words used to describe that work carry extra weight in reaching the interview stage.
Optimize Your CVATS Optimisation
Must-Have Keywords
Include these keywords in your CV to improve your ATS score.
Strengthen Your CV
Power Phrases
Use these multi-word phrases to strengthen your CV.
Avoid These
Words to Avoid
Remove these overused or weak words from your CV.
ATS Score
Before & After ATS Optimization
Before
Missing Keywords
After
Added Keywords
Formatting
ATS-Friendly Format Tips
Place the portfolio URL directly under your name in the header as plain hyperlinked text, for example 'Portfolio: yourname.design', since ATS systems parse header text as a string and can miss a QR code or icon-only link.
Use standard section headers like 'Experience', 'Skills', and 'Education' rather than creative labels like 'My Journey', since ATS parsers map content to fields based on recognized headers.
List tools and skills as plain text in a dedicated Skills section, not inside an image, icon grid, or infographic resume, since ATS software cannot read text embedded in graphics.
Save the CV as a text-based PDF or .docx file, never an image-based or flattened export, since a scanned or flattened PDF returns zero extractable text to the ATS.
Mirror the exact keyword phrasing used in the job description, such as 'design systems' versus 'design system' or 'UI/UX' versus 'UI and UX', since ATS matching is often literal.
Avoid tables and multi-column layouts for the skills and experience sections, since some ATS parsers scramble column order into unreadable text strings.
FAQ
Frequently Asked Questions
Yes. The ATS keyword scan and the human portfolio review serve different purposes: the keywords get a CV past the automated filter and into a recruiter's queue, while the portfolio link is what gets the interview once a human is looking. Both are needed, since without the keywords the CV may never reach the person who would have opened the portfolio.
No. List the tools that can actually be discussed in an interview and that appear in the job posting. Padding a CV with tools used once in a tutorial or bootcamp exercise creates a mismatch that surfaces immediately in a screening call.
No, ATS software cannot parse the visual content behind a portfolio link, it only reads the surrounding text. That is why the link needs to sit in plain, parseable text near the name or contact details, not embedded only in an icon or graphic.
Aim to naturally include the 8-12 most role-specific terms from the posting, such as tool names, methodology terms, and specific deliverables, rather than every word. Over-stuffing reads as unnatural to a human reviewer even when it scores well with the ATS.
Yes, somewhat. UI Designer postings weight visual craft terms like typography, visual hierarchy, and component libraries more heavily, while Product Designer postings add research and strategy terms like user research and information architecture. Match the keyword emphasis to the title the posting actually uses.
Only if it is an image-based or heavily designed PDF without selectable text. A standard text-based PDF exported from Word, Google Docs, or Figma's text layers, not flattened, parses fine in nearly all modern ATS platforms.
Check Your ATS Score Now
Build ATS-Optimized CVRelated